I can also announce that my case against our former employer will take place in a month’s time. I will finally be able to make public what really went down at GB News.

We will demonstrate how they are controlled opposition and operate as containment for the liberal establishment. In my tribunal, we will prove that they discriminated against social conservatives and Christians. Free speech my back foot. Keep your eyes peeled for more on that one…

On NXR this week, on The Next Crusade, we discuss how Islam is incompatible with Western Nations:

Remember, if you’d like to join the NXR team at the Christ is King conference in Texas this November, use code CALVIN for 20% off your ticket.

And from Command Media this week, we have started releasing more original content. We’re publishing daily monologues on theology and politics on my YouTube channel; I hope you enjoy the videos below. And if you have any ideas for content you’d like to see, please reply in the comments.

Feminism: More genocidal than Hitler?

A defence of the Church of England.

A criticism of Anglican superiority.

Can Catholics and Protestants get along?

Why Protestantism is Jewish.

Why Great Britain was the greatest nation ever.

The Crusades were justified.

Did Catholics cause the Reformation?

Diversity for Israel: Our greatest strength, for our greatest ally.

Do not get me wrong, I love my home country. The British Empire was the greatest empire in history, and until a hundred years ago England was the greatest nation in the world. But we slacked, we rested on our laurels, and America has stolen our crown. The liberal elite has run roughshod over all our institutions, and now we have an establishment elite who do little but cover up the systematic grooming and rape of our young girls, whilst simultaneously importing en masse the military-age Mohammedan man who does the raping.

People often wonder why the far-Left and Mohammedans are in bed together. Why would the Labour Party be pro-Islam and pro LGBTQ at the same time? How does that possibly make any sense? Well, they clearly have something in common. We can only speculate as to what that is.

It is astonishing to me how few people seem to realise that Britain is no longer a free country. There are more arrests over free speech-related issues than anywhere else in the world, including the former Soviet Union, for goodness sake. I have far too many friends who have been questioned by the police for their stance on Covid, lockdowns, vaccines, Islam, mass migration, migrant hotels, etc. One would think the biggest crime a Briton can commit at present is to criticise either the government or Islam. A pox on them both.

Which is why I am so thankful for the 1st Amendment of the US Constitution. Enshrining in law protections for free speech and a free press. Without a codified constitution which people believe in, and in which people are willing to protect, how does one have free speech, a free press or freedom of association? One does not.

And on a related note, I am so incredibly thankful for the 2nd Amendment. I know most Brits are liberal on this issue now, including many conservatives, but a man is not truly free unless he can possess a means of defending himself, his family and his nation. We should be able to protect ourselves from all who wish us harm, including our own governments. But that is why they take our guns, is it not? The same thing is happening in Australia right now. Whether a false flag or a genuine terror incident, the establishment uses these awful events to take away our rights. “Never let a good crisis go to waste.”

And our rights are God-given. The government has no right to remove our rights, because they are not granted by them. The government’s job is to defend and protect our rights. The government has a responsibility, as do we, to defend the life and liberty of fellow citizens. Shame on these so-called liberal progressives. For a group which spends so much time talking about the threat of fascism, they sure do act a lot like fascists.

Anyway, I am back in the Home of the Brave, and I cannot recommend it enough. Not as a permanent solution, because we must take our home back, but every Anglo should spend some time in the New World, just to experience true freedom for once. Because like a fish in water, one does not recognise how much one is oppressed until one jumps out of the goldfish bowl for a moment and gains a broader perspective. Britain and Europe are not free. America is the last free nation, and even they are flirting with the same problems we are facing in the Old World. Criticise Israel publicly and see what happens to your 1st Amendment rights…

In this week’s media round-up:

On The Next Crusade: You can’t fight a spiritual war in a chemically castrated body, with Razi Berry, and the origins of Satanism.

Part three of our four-part special series exploring what it means to be a part of the New Christian Right:

I returned to Dan Wootton Outspoken, where we discussed Harry and Meghan’s return to Britain, and I found myself being uncharacteristically charitable towards the pair:

I also had another appearance on The Mike Graham Show, where we discussed the fact that we all need to be a little more racist. The Left hates pattern recognition; they deem anyone who points out demographic facts (ie crime rates) to be racist. I would say we need to take a hard look at the data and determine policies accordingly:

If you would like to read more about how Islam took over much of Europe and major parts of Britain, and what we can do to fight back, grab yourself a copy of my new book, The Silent Jihad, exclusively available from Shop.NewChristianRight.com

And if you like that, you will love our New Christian Right conference, coming up this November. Join me, Alex Jones, Joel Webbon, Dale Partridge, Harrison Smith and more great speakers in Dallas on 12th-14th November 2026. If you use the special discount code CALVIN, you get 20% off your tickets.

I hope to see you there.

It is good to be back!

God bless freedom,

Fr Robinson

During my brief trip to Britain, I sat down with the excellent Lotus Eater, Firas Modad, and we had a brilliant conversation about defeating Islam. You can watch the full interview on the Lotus Eaters website or below on 𝕏:

On The Next Crusade this week, we cover how the Crusades were an overall force for good and the Christian principle of defending one’s own. Tony Moon joins me to talk about his experience as a Rooftop Korean, defending in the LA Riots:

I joined the full NXR team to have a chat about the far right - how far right is too far right? With me, Joel Webbon, Dale Partridge and Harrison Smith. This is part two of our special series; keep an eye out for a couple more of these videos in the next few weeks:

And since it is still August and we are on our summer holidays, here is another Fox & Father Live from Greece, with me and Laurence Fox:

Don’t forget, you can join the NXR team and me in person this November, 12th- 14th in Dallas, Texas. We have a special announcement, too: Alex Jones will be the keynote speaker!

If you use the promo code CALVIN, you can get 20% off your tickets on the NXR website. I hope to see many of you there!

The NXR website also has a fantastic shop where you can find a copy of my new book, The Silent Jihad.

I am reminded of this clip of a former friend of mine, Rod Dreher, being interviewed by Jeremy Boering, in which they both agree that it is theoretically possible to be critical of Israel without being an antisemite, but they also paradoxically agree that everyone who criticises Israel is an antisemite.

Anyone with an ounce of critical thinking can see the Kafkaesque trap here:

In this article, I have no intention of criticising Israel. I am merely posing the thought experiment to my learned readers: Is it possible to be against Benjamin Netanyahu, his administration and their political policies, without being branded as an antisemite? And if so, where is the line?

I ask because I am not sure there is a distinction in many people’s eyes.

So-called Christian Zionists have a theological reason to favour Israel. In their religion, the 1948 state of Israel is the Israel of the Bible. It is a very novel idea, mostly propagated by Scofield and Darby, but I do not want to go off on an anti-’Christian Zionist’ tangent. The point being, one can almost understand their blind allegiance, however much in error they are.

However, even secularists/athiests often seem to have a visceral response to any criticism of Israel.

Responses to even the mildest public criticisms of Israel usually come in the form of “Disgusting!” “Antisemite!” “What happened to you?” or “You’ve changed!”

Note the highly effeminate, strong emotive language of disgust and empty accusations of having somehow changed. The above exclamations are increasingly common, as are accusations of going “beyond the pale,” which suggest there is an obvious line in the sand that people understand we cannot cross, and that crossing it breaks an unwritten social taboo. Criticising Israel is almost blasphemous, even to the irreligious.

I suppose a lot of this comes down to the post-World War II liberal consensus. The idea that the worst thing that has happened in modern history is the Jewish Holocaust, and we must do all we can to prevent it from happening again. I would argue it is not, by the way; the number of innocent babies killed in abortions since their decriminalisation in the 1970s is the greatest evil in modern history, but I am not here to compare evil acts.

We can all agree that the systematic extermination of any group of people is evil - I am not the biggest fan of Islam, but I have repeatedly spoken out against the extermination of Uyghurs in China - Whatever number of Jews were killed during WWII is too many. As is the 6 million Poles who were killed, for whom he went to war in the first place to protect. Around half a million Britons were killed too, and nearly as many Americans. We should mourn all their deaths, and prevent future brother wars at all costs. Europeans fighting Europeans is abominable.

We can agree with all of this, and still be critical of Israel, without wanting to see a re-run of the latter half of WWII.

Part of the problem has to be the conflation between state, people, and religion. Israel, the state set up in 1948; the Israeli people; and the modern religion of Judaism. ‘The Jews’ can be used to describe all three, and is therefore a clumsy and unhelpful descriptor.

But then, people often claim it is not the words themselves that are the issue, but the tone in which they are used. I have always found this to be a lazy argument used to shut down free speech. It usually means there is technically nothing wrong with the words being used, but the person taking offence simply does not like them being used. When one sinks down to the level of policing tone, one has already lost the argument. Tone is subjective; quite a lot can rely on inference. People bring their own prejudices to how they read a statement and may make assumptions about something that was not implied by the writer but is inferred by the reader.

We should define terms. What is antisemitism? There are far too many shifting definitions, from “disagreeing with the right of the Jewish people to have a homeland,” to “disagreeing with the right of Israel to defend itself”, to “the hatred of the Jewish people.” Let us stick with the latter. The original Merriam-Webster dictionary definition: “Opposition to, or hatred of, Semites, especially Jews.” Note that the Oxford Dictionary originally refused to use the word, and the Encyclopædia Britannica would only define it with caveats.

If you want to see an example of woke in practice, look up the very broad definitions from IHRA, JDA and Nexus.

Again, it is a clumsy and unhelpful word, probably by design. Shifting definitions is a mechanism used by bad-faith actors in an attempt to win arguments.

Not long before he was executed, Charlie Kirk said, “You’re not allowed to criticise Israel.”

So, all things considered, is it possible to be critical of Israel without being antisemitic? If so, where is the line - who gets to draw it and why?

I look forward to reading your feedback on this one. Try to keep the arguments in good faith.

A low turnout in the unnecessary by-election, called by Nigel Farage, in which he stood against a range of independent candidates but not a single mainstream party or politician, cost the British taxpayer £250,000. On the evening of Polling Day, he celebrated with the self-named “Farage Fest”, in which at least a dozen middle-aged women danced in celebration of Nigel’s continued mandate. But not to worry, GB News were there to capture every cringe-inducing moment of it.

Of course, now that Mr Farage is a Member of Parliament again, the independent inquiry into the £5,000,000 gift will recommence, which could eventually result in a by-election in Claton, should he be found guilty. Thus, proving this whole affair to have been nothing more than a vanity election.

In other news, Elon Musk joked about acquiring the United Kingdom. But we all know what happened the last time he flirted with the idea of a takeover.

On this week’s episode of The Next Crusade, Mark Mitchell from Honest Poll talks us through the real reason Trump’s voters vanished:

And whilst we holiday in Greece, Laurence Fox and I jumped on air for a live episode of Fox & Father. We ended up talking about World War II history:

Join me in Texas this November for the first NXR Conference: Christ is King. I can now announce a special promo code: use the discount code CALVIN for 20% off. We also have a very special speak announcement, coming soon: https://newchristianright.com/conference

On The Next Crusade, I discuss how Protestantism and Catholicism have been influenced by Jews.

Kevin DeAnna joins me to outline how individualism built the West, but how it is now being used against us:

I popped back home to the Lotus Eaters HQ and recorded an episode with the guys. A fun show, going through Hollywood’s ultimatum, the great Arab welfare scam, and Jon Bernthal’s concept of “dog racism”:

On the Superstar Panel for Dan Wootton Outspoken, we went through the drama between Julia Hartley-Brewer and Charlie Downes, both of whom I think are fantastic people, and the best at what they do. In case you missed it, Charlie went on Julia’s show to argue that ‘White British’ people are being demographically replaced, and Julia acknowledged the demographics are changing but could not agree that it is important that Britain remains White. They went back and forth, but I think the problem is they are talking past each other, and we are probably going to see more of this generational divide on the Right of politics.

I can see where JHB is coming from. It is a noble stance; I think she is trying to protect people like me, who are British but not White. And they both agree that Britain has always been White, but Charlie argues it should remain predominantly White, whereas Julia disagrees, saying that British people are many colours and can be any colour. Personally, I think Charlie’s point stands. As someone who is half White and half Black, I honestly believe it is important that Britain remains predominantly White, as well as majority Christian and English-speaking. All of these things matter. The toothpaste is out of the tube, and White Britons married non-Whites and had British babies. And so, some of us are not White, but that is not to say everyone should look like me. Britain is not Brazil, nor should it aim to be anything other than what it has always been, in that regard.

The problem is, the woke identitarians have been making an idol of skin colour for so long that many on the Right have been arguing that skin colour does not matter at all. Well, it does. It is not the most important aspect, but it is not unimportant. If Britain became entirely Black, it would no longer be Britain. Just as if Britain became majority Islamic, it would no longer be Britain. Nor if Arabic replaced English as the primary language spoken by the people of Britain. We must not make an idol of these things, nor focus on them in isolation, but collectively, they are significant attributes of the British people. Britain is and must always be a White Christian English-speaking nation. So long as God wills this wonderful nation to be.

The Telegraph Editor, Allister Heath, jumped into the conversastion to hurl ad hominem attacks at Charlie and Restore, tweeting “Farage must reject Rupert Lowe’s repugnant dance with white nationalism.” What is repugnant about White British people wanting their nation to remain White British? Is it repugnant for Japanese people to want their nation to remain Japanese? I will tell you what I find repugnant: self-denigrating White liberals like Mr Heath. They are a destructive force in our nation. What is the issue with White nationalism? Which part does he find repugnant, White people or our nation? Heath went on to say, “Restore Britain is beyond the pale.” Thus proving The Telegraph really has ditched its conservative roots and gone fully Lefty liberal. Restore is a party of conservatives, patriots, people who care about the nation and the people within the nation - anyone on the Right or Centre-Right of politics should be in support of that, whether they choose to support the party or not. To suggest they are beyond the pale is overt gatekeeping, but what really confuses me is that Heath is a Zionist; he often talks about how he supports Israel for the Jewish people. Why then, is it not okay for people to support Britain for British people? England should be for the English; Scotland for the Scottish; Wales for the Welsh, etc. This is common sense. The problem with the post-WWII liberal consensus is that any hint of a discussion around ethnicity or nationality for Westerners - or White people - brings up connotations of Naziism. They have been indoctrinated against White people and against nationalism, because they truly think both these things will lead to another Holocaust; it is infantile and unthinking, but you cannot reason with the heavily propagandised. Zionism of this variety is brain rot: “We must support ethno-nationalism for Israel, but not for White people, because that will OBVIOUSLY always lead to the extermination of the Jews.” The Jews have become a protected class, and White people are becoming endangered, making up only 12% of the population. If something is not done, White people will become extinct in a couple of generations. Ancestry matters. White lives matter.

Granted, the issue of demographic replacement is a complicated matter. I would love to hear your takes on this one:

I also had the privilege of joining my old friend Mike Graham in the studio for The Mike Graham Show, where we addressed the changing demographics of Britain. I will have more content with Mike in the future; we have some really great ideas planned, so keep your eyes peeled for that.

It really is fantastic to see the industry greats going independent:

I hope you are all having a lovely week. I have just arrived in Greece, so I am going to put the laptop away, grab a Mythos and think of you all whilst I look out over the Aegean Sea. Thank God for His beautiful creation.

There will be no Common Sense Crusade throughout August, but we are working on an exciting new format for when we return in September.

God bless you all, and I will report back next Friday.

Grace and peace,

Fr Calvin Robinson

P. S. If you have not yet grabbed a copy of my first solo book, The Silent Jihad, you can find it exclusively in the NXR shop. And we are hosting a conference later this year in Dallas, Texas. Do join us for that, 12-14th November.

[Source: @MrAustinPredict]

The state-sanctioned killing of the unborn is a grave evil. As a society, we continue to allow the murder of the most vulnerable. There is no wonder most Western nations are under judgment: “The foreigner who is among you shall mount above you higher and higher; and you shall come down lower and lower.” (Deuteronomy 28:43–44)

Proverbs 6 teaches us, “There are six things the Lord hates… hands that shed innocent blood.”

Europe is being overrun by Mohammedans, America and Canada by Indians. Things are certainly not looking good in Spain this week. Lord have mercy. May we stop killing our babies, and may the Lord spare us from foreign rule.

I address this problem and highlight solutions in my new book, The Silent Jihad, available exclusively from NXR.

On The Next Crusade this week, I offer a critical perspective on Anglican superiority, suggesting that Anglicanism is a unique tradition rather than a superior expression of the Christian faith compared to Roman Catholicism or Eastern Orthodoxy. Sectarianism does not help to advance the Kingdom. What is more important is striving toward Christian unity.

We also break the distinctions between civic nationalism and ethnic nationalism. Are either of them even a thing? Civic nationalism seems like liberalism, enjoying the fruits of nationalism without wanting to recreate the conditions that bore those fruits; ethno-nationalism seems more like a derogatory slur for what is actually just plain old-fashioned nationalism.

Why are other countries allowed to promote their national interests, but not us? If we want to survive as a nation, that has to change.

Ashlea Simon and I discuss the differences between being English and British.

The Next Crusade will be back next week with another spicy monologue and a fantastic guest!

On Fox & Father this week, Laurence Fox and I have a candid conversation about contemporary political developments, immigration policy, and the state of British public institutions. We discuss recent news events while exploring personal reflections on faith, the challenges of modern discourse, and our perspectives on maintaining national identity in the current social climate.

There will be no Fox & Father this coming Sunday; Laurence has been busy on the campaign trail. F&F may be spotty throughout August; we will both be in Greece. But we will try to record some in-person shows for you whilst we are out there!

On my Common Sense Crusade this week, we discuss flock cameras and nanny statism with Leilani Dowding. If we do not push back against Big Brother whilst we still can, it may soon be too late! All of the books we read growing up, from 1984 to Brave New World, seem to be coming true. Along with movies like Demolition Man and Minority Report. Make science fiction fiction again!

I was also joined by Joe McBride, lawyer to Andrew and Tristan Tate. It should be noted that this interview was recorded before their most recent arrest.

My Common Sense Crusade will not go on summer hiatus. We’ll be back with a new format after the summer holiday. I’m ‘on vacation,’ as they say here in the States, until September. But my Substack and other content will continue. We’re working on some great new plans for the Crusade; do keep an eye on Command Media.

The New Christian Right are hosting a conference in Dallas, Texas, this November. It would be great to see some of you there!

Abraham was asked to bind his son, Isaac, and offer him up as a sacrifice. Abraham passed the test, showing his sincere faith in God by offering up his son on the altar, but an angel prevented him at the last minute. Again, the typology is clear, and in place of Isaac and the rest of us, God the Father offers up His only begotten Son instead.

The Temple was destroyed in 70AD for that reason. We are the new temple. Christ said to Peter, “On this Rock I will build my Church.” That Rock is literally Peter, the first Pope, but that rock is also Peter’s faith in Christ, and more importantly, that rock is also Christ. Christ as the cornerstone, on which our faith is built. Christ Himself, and Christ’s servants, and Christ’s body - the Church - are all the new Temple. There will be no ‘third temple’ for that reason. We receive the gifts of the Holy Spirit through the Sacraments of Baptism and Confirmation, and we receive Christ’s Body and Blood in the Most Blessed Sacrament of the Altar. And so we are, spiritually, really and presently, temples for God.

Likewise, the priest class was replaced. Gone are the corrupt Pharisees and Scribes. The Church institutes deacons, presbyters, and bishops for the purposes of ministering to the faithful and administering the sacraments. In other words, to celebrate the sacrifice. Christian ministry is sacrificial in that way.

Jesus is crucified once and for all. And the Mass is the blessed sacrament by which we enter Calvary, and as a congregation gathered together in His name, we are joined with the Communion of Saints in an act of true worship, as the priest at the altar removes himself, dons the sacred vestments as an unworthy servant (“quam ego indignus fámulus tuus óffero tibi”), and takes the place of Christ, offering up the oblations to the Father. In that moment, heaven and earth are joined - the parish and the choir of angels are one in praise and worship of the one true living God (“Deo meo vivo et vero”). “Súscipe, sancte Pater, omnípotens aeterne Deus”, says the priest, addressing God the Father, “hanc immaculátam hostiam,” offering up an unspotted and immaculate victim; the hostiam or host, is the sacrificial offering, preparing for the spotless Lamb of God as the bread is about to become the true Victim.

The offering is propitiatory, “pro innumerabílibus peccátis, et offensiónibus, et negligentiis meis,” offered for the sins of the priest, and the sins of the congregation, “et pro ómnibus circumstántibus, sed et pro ómnibus fidélibus Christiánis vivis atque defunctis.” The Mass is offered for both the living and the dead. Christ’s passion and resurrection is enough for all. All of this is for our final purpose, eternal salvation, “ut mihi, et illis proficiat ad salútem in vitam aeternam.” The ultimate sacrifice.

All this to say, Christians have always known we are a faith of sacrifice. The ultimate sacrifice of the only begotten Son of God, for us. But also our own personal sacrifices, as we are called to pick up our own crosses and follow Him to Calvary, metaphorically as we suffer through life and are formed and sanctified by His Grace, but also literally as we attend the Mass. It is for this reason that Catholics have always taught that the Eucharist (the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass) is "the source and summit of the Christian life."

Protestantism denies the sacrifice of the Mass as a core tenet, and the Novus Ordo undermines the sacrifice. Bear with me on the latter, whilst we address the former.

The reason Pope Leo XIII declared Anglican Holy Orders “null and void” was that all sacrificial language was removed from the Ordinal in the Book of Common Prayer - the liturgy used to ordain clergy in the Church of England. Without explicit sacerdotal language, the Holy Father deemed there to be a defect of form and intention. This was no accident. Martin Luther, Huldrych Zwingli, and Thomas Cranmer all worked to remove the sacrificial offerings from the formula of the Mass. The Canon was stripped by design to undermine the teaching of the Real Presence.

If one considered that the enemy does not want us becoming living temples of God, one might assume he wants us to no longer receive the Body and Blood of Christ. How might he go about convincing us to no longer do so? By implicitly teaching us that the bread remains bread, the wine remains wine, and there is no more sacrifice. I put it to you that this theology is empty and leads people toward death. Without the Holy Eucharist, there is no health in us. Christ Himself is the gift of Life (Romans 6:23, John 14:6, 1 John 5:11–12).

The reason for bringing this up is not to disparage my separated brethren in Christ, but to encourage all Christians to focus on the sacrifice and return to the Sacraments, as a matter of salvation. You have been robbed of your inheritance.

As for the Novus Ordo, much like the Protestant Reformation, where the Canon of the Mass was stripped, this time the Offertory prayers were changed. The sacrificial language we quoted earlier was removed, and in its place Jewish bread-breaking prayers were added. The Mass was also moved from the High Altar to a table in the nave. This is not inconsequential. Instead of a priest offering up the oblations on an altar toward God, on behalf of his congregation, instead, Rabbinic meal blessings are said around a table, facing the congregation. The Holy Sacrifice of the Mass has been turned into nothing more than a Jewish meal. Is it any wonder the vast majority of Catholics polled no longer believe in the Real Presence of Christ? Why would you believe Jesus is truly present in the sacrifice when you no longer witness a sacrifice, and instead a little old lady hands you a piece of bread to eat? As lovely and well-intentioned as these little old ladies are, “Extraordinary Eucharistic Ministers” are neither extraordinary nor necessary. The priest’s hands are consecrated with holy oils for the purposes of administering the Sacraments. It is another ploy of the enemy to persuade people that there is some need for lay women - and it is primarily women - to defile the blessed host in this way. Each small step further dilutes the faith of your average Catholic.

Removing altar rails, preventing kneeling in reverence, encouraging ‘active participation’ and use of the vernacular all seemed like small and benign changes, but over time they have led to the dancing and prancing around that we see in many modern N.O. churches today.

To Christians, we are the new Israel - the spiritual Israel - the Church is a continuation of God’s chosen people. The Old Testament points toward the coming of Christ, and the New Testament speaks of His fulfilment of the old prophecies and promises of God. No one is replaced, but everyone is welcomed in. The Jews who followed their Messiah - the Christ - became members of the Church, and the Gentiles who joined them were grafted in. This is a marvellous gift our Lord has given us.

Fast forward a few hundred years, and a few of the people who rejected Christ attempted to reclaim their old faith. Modern-day Judaism is not the same as the Judaism of the Bible. There is no temple, there are no sacrifices, the priest class is gone. Christ did not follow the Talmud. In fact, it is a direct reaction to and rejection of Christ. Christians should steer clear of this modern ideology, especially as it attempts to influence our faith.

The Church has always prayed for the unbelieving or perfidious Jews, until the post-World War II liberal consensus decided that was not nice language to use. Again, this weird obsession with what is nice over what is good. At the same time, a Jewish ‘convert’ helped draft Nostra Aetate - which waters down language about the Jews having Christ killed - before leaving the Church to marry a former nun and live with his male lover. Tell me that is not the infiltration of the enemy in the institution of the Church. Gregory Baum bragged in his memoirs of having kept his perverse sexuality a secret in order to not risk ruining his credibility and “influence as a critical theologian.”

Of course, the gates of hell will never prevail against the Church. But that does not mean the enemy will not try his best to infiltrate her and obscure the truth.

In 1917, in one of the most significant and most heavily proven apparitions of Our Lady, the Mother of God appeared at Fatima, apparently warning of a loss of faith among the hierarchy and the faithful, with the devil reaching the highest levels of the Church. If you have not looked into the story of Our Lady of Fatima, I strongly advise it, even if you are usually sceptical of private revelation, as the Miracle of the Sun of 13th October 1917 was witnessed and verified by around 100,000 people, including atheists, journalists, sceptics, etc.

It is said that Pope Leo XIII had a vision after celebrating Mass in the Vatican, where he came away pale, and witnesses described him as looking fearful. He explained that St Michael the Archangel had warned him that Satan had boasted that he could destroy the Church, and that he had requested a hundred years to exert his influence. God permitted this, one would suspect for a similar reason to the Biblical story of Job. But if this story is true, that century is surely at an end now. We may be seeing the last few bad fruits.

I suppose much of this is why I have sympathy with our brethren in the SSPX. They are doing their utmost to defend the deposit of faith. The Traditional Latin Mass is more than just a preference or a language choice; the Mass is everything to a good Catholic, and the TLM teaches the fullness of the truth in a way that can be vague and ambiguous in other forms. And to Catholics, form and intention matter.

We often look back at the English Martyrs and ask ourselves if we would have had the courage to stand up against the tyrannical establishment, and continued with the faith as once delivered to the saints. But to many, that is becoming a reality. In places where the Mass of the Ages is not offered, and an LGBTQ+ affirming boomer priest and his Karen army are offering a Jewish alternative, what is a father to do to ensure his children are brought up Catholic? After all, our faith is taught through osmosis as much as it is through catechesis. The implicit matters as much as the explicit. You can tell your children all day every day that Christ is in the Tabernacle, but if no one genuflects as they pass him, why would they believe you? And so the question remains: would you defend the Mass at any cost, even against the institution of the Church?

On my Common Sense Crusade this week we are joined by Fr Frank Pavone and Jeremy Tate - Christians don’t roll over!

And on The Next Crusade we are joined by former FBI agent and whistleblower Kyle Seraphin to discuss the incredibly sound idea behind ‘bacon cheeseburger nationalism’, and the disappointments of both Patel and Bongino in the Fed.

On Fox & Father, Laurence Fox is preparing to stand in the by-election in Clacton, which I advise him against.

And, of course, every week I appear on ’s Outspoken. You can catch me live on Wednesdays. Here is this week’s show:

Summer holiday/vacation break:

The Common Sense Crusade, The Next Crusade and Fox & Father will be back next week. After that, I am going on my summer holiday throughout August. I’ll be back to my usual routine in September. Stay subscribed to my Substack, I’ll still keep you updated here, and The Next Crusade will still be coming out every week as usual, but my Common Sense Crusade will be on a break throughout August. No doubt Laurence and I will record some episodes of Fox & Father from Greece, beer permitting.

Thank you to all those who have purchased my new book, The Silent Jihad, which is exclusively available from the NXR Studios shop.

Join us in person this autumn (fall for you yanks) in Dallas, Texas. 12th-14th November. See you there!

On my Common Sense Crusade, I discuss the fact that White people are under attack, with Lilly Gaddis & Lee Harris.

We have a third show this week, too. I spent time with Joel Webbon, Dale Partridge, and Harrison Smith in Texas to film a special mini-series on how to save the West. Part one of four is now live, a good faith message to men like Andrew Wilson & John Doyle:

Join me, Joel, Dale, Harrison and co in person at the Christ Is King: America After Trump event on 12th–14th November 2026, in Dallas, Texas. Tickets are limited. Register now to secure your seat! Use code CALVIN for 20% off your ticket. https://newchristianright.com/conference/

And Sunday’s episode of Fox & Father, with Laurence Fox and me:

On my Common Sense Crusade, we continue our mini-series on the importance of gun rights and the beauty of the Second Amendment. We are joined by Dave Atherton & Jade Warwick to discuss all things Britain and America.

And my book, The Silent Jihad, is on sale in the New Christian Right shop. You can find all three below. Thank you for watching, liking, following, subscribing and all the usual. Your support means the world to me and the team. God bless.

The Next Crusade (NXR Studios)

Common Sense Crusade (Command Media)

The Silent Jihad

The subheading is not hyperbole. Unfortunately, it is no exaggeration to say women are killing more people than Hitler, Stalin and Mao combined. On The Next Crusade this week, we discuss the fact that feminism is the most destructive ideology of all time. You can read a text transcript of this monologue on my Substack; the video is below:

Guns in ‘Murica

On my Common Sense Crusade, we start a mini-series on the brilliance of the Second Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America. In this episode, we discuss why the elites love gun control. Next week we will go over why we need more good guys with guns.

The Saints

Every day I publish a video explaining the life of a Christian Saint. The hope being that we can influence people away from toxic Celebrity culture and give faithful examples of how to live a holy and good life instead. Check out my Daily Lives of the Saints series by subscribing to me here on Substack - the best place to support me, as a free speech platform; you know they will never cancel me.

Mohammedanism

And, if you would like to find out more about the Islamification of the West - aka Christendom - how we got here, and what we can do to fix it, check out my new book: The Silent Jihad.

Valediction

Thank you for subscribing. Please let me know your thoughts on The Next Crusade and my Common Sense Crusade in the comments below or by replying to this email. God bless you all!

Grace and peace,

Fr Robinson

The Society, founded by the late Most Reverend Marcel Lefebvre to protect the Tradition of the Catholic Church, has been seen as controversial by modern Catholics because of the growing divide between the New Order and the Old - the Novus Ordo and the Vetus Ordo. Without going into too much inside baseball, there have been arguments over whether the SSPX were schismatic, irregular or in full communion with Rome since the first consecrations in 1988, or indeed, since the Society was founded in 1970. The Vatican has now issued a decree outlining that all bishops, priests and laymen who continue to attend SSPX chapels are ipso facto excommunicated. This will come as a huge blow to families who attend these chapels not out of defiance of Rome, but to ensure they raise their children in the fullness of the faith, in line with Sacred Tradition. There are many lay Catholics who are attempting to avoid the local modernist church where Pride Masses, same-sex blessings, altar girls, lay Eucharistic Ministers and Drag Queen story time are promoted as the norm. Understandably so.

One would have hoped the Pope would have met with the SSPX Superior General at the very least - such an invitation was not forthcoming. It is regular practice for the Prefect of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith (DDF) to meet in such situations. Unfortunately, that is currently Cardinal Fernández, the author of “Heal Me With Your Mouth: The Art of Kissing” and “Mystical Passion: Spirituality and Sensuality.” How such a man got into a position of such power and influence with such scandalous and blasphemous books about “mystical orgasms” and an “erotic encounter with Jesus Christ” is beyond me. But one can surely appreciate why traditionalist Catholics would not be particularly excited about meeting with him. And all that said, there is nothing to prevent the Holy Father from meeting with the SSPX. After all, he recently met and prayed with a priestess, the Archisopette of Canterbury. I believe it would have been a good thing for the Pope to grant the SSPX a papal mandate to elect their bishops, because they are doing so out of necessity. Faithful families need bishops to confirm their children. Bishops are a prerequisite for access to the Sacraments, and that is the primary purpose of the Church.

It has been sad to see people celebrating these excommunications with glee. Catholic families around the world will be facing a tough dilemma because of this, and any separation of the faithful from each other should be a cause of sadness. We should pray for unity, and anyone gloating should repent.

Some lay Catholics are now going to have to choose between adhering to Catholic Tradition but being excommunicated, or being in Communion with Rome but embracing modernism. No one should be forced into this situation. Many people will disagree with me, but I know this to be true as I have spoken to families in these situations. It is a dichotomy that should not exist. The Traditional Latin Mass is a significant part of the deposit of faith, as is communion with the Pope. One should never be put into a scenario where one must choose one over the other. And that raises the question: what does it mean to be Catholic? The Athanasian Creed would teach us that it is, first and foremost, about our faith, and that is what the SSPX’s response has been. Again, that is not to say communion with Rome is unimportant; of course, it is a vital factor in Catholicism, but is it the definition? It was once the wholeness of the universal faith that was the priority. What happens when the pope is wrong? And we must not forget that the Mass is the source and summit of the Catholic faith. (CCC 1324)

Are there other routes for disciplining ‘disobedient’ bishops without excommunicating them? Can consecrating bishops in the faith ever be disobedient? Especially when the Church is in a time of crisis. The SSPX have determined that the Church is in a state of necessity. If it is the Vatican which is the cause of the necessity, can the Vatican rightly excommunicate those calling for restoration? So many questions, but the one at the forefront of my mind is, will there also be excommunications for Fr James Martin who promotes same-sex blessings, the German bishops who push for priestesses, the Sisters of St Joseph who ditched their habits and act like priests, Cardinal Kasper for communing divorcees, Cardinals McElroy and Cupich for pushing progressive politics, Bishop Martin and Archbishop Weisenburger for vindictively suppressing the Tradition of the Church, which it is their sacred duty to protect? Somehow I doubt it. Just this week, Fr Jim O’Keefe hosted what looked like a gay wedding in church and said, ‘We celebrate two men who are honourably gay.’ He remains in good standing with the Church.

Obedience is important, but blind obedience has never been Church practice. We are to be obedient in all things lawful and right. The virtue of obedience must always serve the Truth. Archbishop Lefebvre said, “Obedience is a virtue intended to direct us toward good, not toward evil.”

The modernists have a stranglehold on the Vatican. A clergyman can promote abortion, LGBTQ+, mass migration or communism and seemingly remain in good standing - all issues which go against the faith. But in defending the Apostolic Tradition, the SSPX have found themselves booted out. None of this seems right, just or fair. What you permit, you promote!

There is a Pharisaical legalism about all of this. People latching onto the letter of Canon Law, without considering the Spirit.

There is an evident Papal positivism rearing its ugly head, which is outside the Tradition of the Faith. This could be the fruit of an exaggerated ultramontanist interpretation of Vatican I, and the American legal culture could have some part to play in all this, with its emphasis on positive law. But what is certain is that we could all do with re-reading St John Henry Newman: “The Pope is a guardian of Tradition, not its master.”

The Pope, as the Vicar of Christ and Successor of St Peter, has supreme and universal primacy in the Church. He has the authority to teach and govern. But his authority is limited; it is ministerial, not arbitrary or absolute. As Bishop Athanasius Schneider said, there has been “an implicit divinisation of the pope” amongst papal-positivists, modernists, and hyper-ultramontanists. As well as being bound by collegiality, divine and natural law (thus the inability to command the faithful to sin or contradict the moral order), he is bound by the Deposit of Faith and Church Tradition. In regard to the Deposit of Faith (Sacred Scripture + Sacred Tradition), the pope is its guardian and interpreter, not its master or creator. He cannot invent new doctrines or abrogate essential elements of Tradition. Tell me how suppressing the Traditional Latin Mass is not abrogating essential elements of Tradition. In adhering to Apostolic Tradition and in consecrating bishops out of necessity, the SSPX seem to be in the right. In my humble opinion, the popes were out of bounds by suppressing the Mass, and it is wrong to excommunicate bishops who have declared that the Church is in a state of grave necessity. Especially considering that all of this could have been avoided if a mandate had been granted.

Prayers for unity must continue. But that will come from two directions, not one.

It has been very telling seeing the vicious attacks from one camp of Catholics towards another. Again, I am neither Roman Catholic nor SSPX; I have no dog in this fight. But wrong is wrong. The Novus Ordo fangirls and fanboys who have been attacking their brothers and sisters in Christ need to reflect on their motivations.

People are pointing out that there are other options for the laity, such as the FSSP, but let us not pretend that the FSSP would exist were it not for the SSPX, which has been a prominent defender of the faith once delivered to the saints. And most dioceses no longer have ready access to TLM Masses, because vindictive modernist bishops have suppressed the Mass of the Ages, in accordance with Traditionis Custodes.

And so, now, many people really will have to choose between the Mass celebrated by most Christians throughout Church history and the New Mass of Vatican II and the faith that accompanies it. No one is suggesting the Novus Ordo is any less valid than the Vetus Ordo, but as catholics we believe lex orandi lex credendi. How you worship matters - faith is taught implicitly as well as explicitly, and children pick up a lot through osmosis. Yes, there are some reverent N.O. Masses, but that is far from the standard. Catholic families deserve better.

There is some question on the legality of the excommunications, like there was in 1988, and that will resolve itself with time, no doubt. But for now, let us pray for a reunited Church. As Christ prayed that we are all one, as He is one with the Father. (John 17:20-23)

And remember, Saints Joan of Arc, Mary MacKillop, Athanasius of Alexandria, and Columba were excommunicated, too. Excommunication does not necessarily mean permanent separation.

Pray for the SSPX. Her clergy and her faithful members.

I often hear people remark, ‘call no man father,’ so I address that common misconception head-on. As with all of the Scriptures, it is best to read the whole chapter, rather than taking one line out of context. Much like “do not judge,” if we stop before the end, we often miss the important lesson our Lord is trying to teach us. Let us learn from the Scriptures rather than use them to reinforce what we already believe.

Anthropologist, Jeremy Ryan Slate, talks us through the parallels between the fall of the Roman Empire and what we are seeing in the West today. Are we witnessing the fall of Christendom?

Bryan Kemper promotes the abolitionist movement:

Common Sense Crusade

This week, we interview Fred Pawle about the increasingly dire situation in Australia - it seems they are experiencing similar Islamification issues facing the rest of the British Commonwealth. And Mike Fairclough on how traditionalists can educate their children, and stop relying on the state to parent and form the next generation:

The Silent Jihad

Every week it seems we have a new story of stabbings, attempted beheadings, rape and murder of heritage Westerners by the invading Mohammedans. I outline how and why we let this happen in my new book, The Silent Jihad.

What a difficult week it has been. Rupert Lowe’s Restore Party released the Rape Gang Inquiry Report, exposing a scale of abuse which we have never seen before.

The Rape Gang Inquiry Report demonstrates that girls as young as 11 were regularly and systematically groomed, drugged, raped and tortured. On occasion, they even harmed toddlers. This was happening everywhere, in at least 40% of Britain. Swept under the carpet by the authorities. Perpetrators were primarily Mohammedan men, mostly of Pakistani origin. Islamic culture and theology enabled this. We should never have allowed such a dangerous ideology into our country.

Have you ever wondered why Mohammedans do not seem to speak out against their own? Islamic doctrine supports the behaviour of the “grooming gangs.” Islam teaches Mohammedan superiority, al-walã’ wa-l-barä’. They can rape non-Mohammedans/kuffar. There is no age of consent in Islam. Islam is evil. All of which I was to cover in my Oxford Union debate. At some point, I will release my speech, with the theological breakdown of why Islam is entirely incompatible with Christendom.

These monsters put white British girls through repeated gang rape, drugging, trafficking between towns/cities, torture, filming for blackmail, pregnancies, coerced abortions, children removed by the state, forced conversions to Islam, and sham marriages. Up and down the country.

Victims were often criminalised as “prostitutes,” ignored by police/social services, or worse, returned to their abusers. Whistleblowers faced retaliation, were silenced and/or arrested. They were discredited, and their careers were ruined for pointing out basic pattern recognition. Police ignored reports, destroyed evidence, and released suspects. Social services placed girls in exploitative environments and undermined parents. Institutions such as the NHS and schools, and licensed companies such as taxi firms, recorded abuse but took no action. They even renewed licences for known perpetrators. Politicians were sometimes in denial, sometimes they outright covered all this up for the sake of multiculturalism. Everyone complicit in the cover-up should be arrested and charged, post-haste.

Young girls were not just trafficked nationally/internationally; they were raped in cars, graveyards, hotels; subjected to extreme violence, objects were inserted into them, they were force-raped by dogs whilst Mohammedans filmed.

Deportation is no longer enough. These animals need the Biblical millstone treatment from Matthew 18:6.

What makes matters worse is that hundreds of illegal Mohammedan men crossed the Channel again this week. The authorities continue to do nothing. Why we have not taken the Australian approach and dispatched gunboats, I do not know. Great Britain is an island, for goodness sake, there is no excuse for the continued invasion by hostile military-age men.

Something has to be done, and soon. We owe our girls better than this.

For those who have already been wronged, justice must prevail. But for those who remain innocent, we must do all we can to protect them from the same fate. If the Establishment will not, it falls upon British men to step up.

I encourage you all to read the report. It has changed me. Let it change you, too. We cannot go on like this.

And despite all this, the British public still voted Labour in the by-election on Thursday in Makerfield. The same party which purposefully began mass migration to Britain, the same party responsible for the cover-up of the “grooming gangs”. The same party whose politicians were named and shamed as being active participants in the gang-rape of these young white British girls. What is it going to take for people to wake up? I understand there is an entire generation that still gets its news from the legacy media, and the BBC has refused to cover this scandal, but still, ignorance is no excuse at this point.

As for the BBC, we all know why they refused to cover the greatest child sex abuse scandal in the history of our country, because the BBC is institutionally paedophilic. Jimmy Saville, Stuart Hall, Rolf Harris, Gary Glitter, Huw Edwards, Peter Rowell, these are just a few of the paedo coverups and scandals perpetrated at the BBC in recent years. The BBC needs defunding. But we also have to do a better job as independent media of reaching those who still rely on the mainstream media for their information.

We have a country to save, and it is going to take all of us. Men need to become men again. I am shocked to the core that the largest-scale rape endemic in history has just been exposed, and nothing has happened. Likewise, in the U.S., Epstein’s co-conspirators remain unpunished. Ghislaine Maxwell was found guilty of child sex trafficking, but there were apparently no perpetrators to charge?! The whole thing stinks. The paedophilic elite continue to cover their own backs, and we continue to let them. Two hundred and fifty years ago, the Americans led a revolution for far less, ditching the English establishment. Not long after that, the French introduced their elite to the guillotine. Today, we sit around, tweet on X about how awful everything is, continue sipping our fancy coffee, and see who is winning in the World Cup. Bread and circuses… shame on all of us.

Where is the righteous indignation? And how are we going to channel it? We are not voting our way out of this one…

Common Sense Crusade from Command Media:

In this week’s episode, I cover the Executive Summary and a Witness Testimony from the Rape Gang Inquiry Report, and Sammy Woodhouse joins me to share her testimony as a rape gang survivor and her contributions as a lead on the Inquiry team.

The Next Crusade from NXR Studios:

I argue against reparations; Frank Wright gives us his take on British politics and his faith in the Restore party; and Chase Geiser on InfoWars, U.S.-Israel, the petrodollar, and public fatigue with propaganda.

Thank you for subscribing. Substack is the best place to support me; it is a platform that truly believes in free speech.

The Next Crusade comes out every Thursday, and my Common Sense Crusade is released every Friday.

You can also find me weekly on Fox & Father over at Reclaim the Media and Outspoken on Wednesdays.

God be with you.

We have some excellent content on the shows this week, with a really stellar line-up of guests:

Common Sense Crusade

• An update on growing tensions in Belfast, as patriots rise up against invading immigrants, and the Establishment’s response.

• Plus, we are joined by to give us an exclusive behind-the-scenes look at his journey from the mainstream media to the independent world; from ITV and The Sun to TalkRadio and GB News, and being cancelled by the legacy media before branching out on his own and the freedom that brings. The interviewer gets interviewed.

The Next Crusade

• Islam and censorship fears, and why I will no longer be calling Protestants ‘Pastor’.

• Lauren Chen joins me to discuss the Black problem in America.

• The Reverend Brett Murphy gives us an update on Uniting the Kingdom and the Church in England.

Be sure to subscribe here on Substack as the best way to support my work - Substack is the free speech platform that will not cancel me! :)

You can also subscribe to our YouTube channels to get immediate access to my shows: Common Sense Crusade from Command Media, The Next Crusade from NXR Studios, and Fox & Father from Reclaim the Media.

God bless you, and thank you for watching!

“Diversity, equity and inclusion” kills. An effeminate HR culture has pushed the idea of social cohesion at all costs, making apparent racism a worse crime than murder. This has developed into a two-tier system where ethnic minorities are privileged due to their perceived oppression in a predominantly white country, where being white is seen as a negative. Every other culture is celebrated except British, English, Welsh, Scottish and Northern Irish cultures. And every other demographic group is a protected characteristic except for white people, Christians, Britons and heterosexual men.

We are living through a silent jihad, carried out by demographic replacement, encouraged by a cowardly elite.

If we do not do something soon, Britain will be lost forever. One of the greatest societies in human history - arguably the greatest empire in modern history - is being led down the pan by a metropolitan liberal elite only looking out for their own vested interests. By somewhere between 2050 and 2060, Britons will be a minority in Britain. Christianity is already on the decline, no longer being the predominant faith for the first time in over a thousand years.

The problem is huge, but too many are still afraid of even addressing it. The elephant in the room grows larger and larger, whilst the enemy performs a silent jihad. The hour is later than you think.

I address this issue head-on in my first book, The Silent Jihad, which is out now! Order your copy directly from the New Christian Right website.

And this week’s episode of The Next Crusade - Episode 5 - is available on YouTube (below), we address the topic of restoring the patriarchy. Men and women are not interchangeable. We are equal in terms of dignity and worth in the eyes of God, but we are not equal in role or ability. We are meant to be hierarchical. God’s good order is hierarchical. God the Father is the ultimate patriarch, and men are submissive to His authority, as wives are submissive to their husbands, and children to their mother. A radical concept in modernity, captured by feminism, but Jenna Ellis outlines this and inter-racial marriages from a Christian perspective. Tune in for some healthy disagreement.

Plus, we delve into vaccines, ticks and viruses with epidemiologist, :

You can read my previous article about our invitation to speak at the Oxford Union on “This House believes the West is Right to be Suspicious of Islam”, and how Thames Valley Police and the Oxford Council conspired to cancel us, on my Substack.

What I did not know at the time of writing was the deeply scandalous involvement of the soon-to-be-former Bishop of Oxford.

In a display of false ecumenism and indifferentism, The Right Reverent Steven Croft co-signed a letter with a local Imam, as “co-chairs” of the Oxfordshire Faith and Civic Leaders Forum and the Thames Valley Faith and Civic Leaders Forum.

Christianity is the one true religion. Islam is a post-Christian heresy. To pretend the two are equal suggests they are mutually true, and therefore promotes the heresy of pluralism.

“Bishop” Croft demonstrates incorrect priorities, showing how worldly and inverted his faith is. Any true Christian shepherd in Britain should be concerned about the rapid growth and seemingly unstoppable rise of Islam in our country. To be “disturbed and saddened” by an invitation to have a conversation on the topic shows he either fears the world more than he fears God or has lost his way. Or worse, that he is a wolf in sheep’s clothing.

Christianity teaches that Jesus Christ is the way. Not a way. Not one way among many, but the way, the truth and the life. The objective universal truth. The faith teaches that the only way to the Father is through the Son.

Croft cited a shooting in a foreign country as an argument as to why a conversation cannot be had in ours. Not only is this a flawed argument, but it is also an appeal to guilt by association, not exactly a Christian principle. Tensions are rising in Britain due to the incompatible worldviews between Christians and Mohammedans. There is a spiritual battle going on for Christendom. In centuries gone by, Bishops have led the charge against the Islamic invasion - now, they fight for the other side.

The debate to be had was on the question of “This House believes the West is Right to be Suspicious of Islam”; to paint this as ‘hatred’ is disingenuous and woke. Disagreement is not hatred, questioning is not hatred, suspicion is not hatred.

Croft also attempts to conflate religion with race. He paints the premise as racist. To be concerned about our Christian country becoming more Islamic is not racist, because Islam is not a race, but even if it were, that would be a matter of self-preservation and self-defence. Why are other nations entitled to self-determination but not us?

As with all liberals, Croft bemoans that the whole thing is stoking ‘division.’ This is one point we agree on. But division is not inherently bad. Jesus Christ is the most divisive man in history - he is our judge and will one day ultimately divide us between heaven and hell for all eternity (Matthew 25:31-34, 41, 46 & John 5:22-23, 27-30). Whilst here on earth as God incarnate - fully God yet fully man - He taught that He came to divide mother from daughter, father from son (Matthew 10:34-36 & Luke 12:51-53); He also told us He would separate the wheat from the chaff (Matthew 3:11-12 & 13:24-30, 36-43). He could not have been more explicit when he said, “Do you think that I have come to give peace on earth? No, I tell you, but rather division” (Luke 12:51). We are either with Him, or against Him (Matthew 12:30). Christian faith leaders should be separating the truth from falsehoods, the one true faith from false ideologies. Pretending all faith is good presents the idea that all religions are salvific. Which raises the question, who/what does Croft believe in?

The so-called Bishop of Oxford retires this weekend. It seems he wanted to get one last jab in before he left. Croft has a long history of being a progressive Leftist. For instance, in recent years, he became the most senior member of the Church of England to support same-sex marriage, which is obviously contrary to Christian teaching, which is that marriage is a lifelong, indissoluble union between one man and one woman.

As a high-ranking member of the Established Church, the State Church at that, Croft is yet another Establishment shill putting pressure on the students at the Oxford Union. In his joint statement, he is subordinating the truth and Free Speech to a subjective sense of ‘safety’ and feelings. This is the kind of effeminate response one would expect from a hard Left activist, not a supposed Bishop in the Church of God.

Instead of aligning with Mohammedans against the few Christians willing to speak the truth plainly, he should be evangelising Mohammedans and leading them to Christ. Croft is clearly betraying the second-greatest commandment, to love our neighbour, because no one who loves someone would neglect to lead them toward salvation and instead actively lead them toward damnation. Either Croft does not believe, or he is working for the other side.

Pray for a bold and courageous successor to be selected. Although, looking at the current state of the Church of England, the pickings are slim.

False peace is no true peace at all. We are at war, whether Croft wants to admit it or not, for the very soul of our country. True peace can only be found in ordered submission to Christ and His Church. Pax Christi.

I will be speaking on this very topic at the Christ is King conference in Texas, later this year, alongside Dale Partridge, Harrisson Smith, J. P. Sears, Joel Webbon, James Fishback, Alex Stein and Joshua Haymes. Register as an early bird by 31st May and get 50% off tickets and a choice of two signed NXR books, including my upcoming book, The Silent Jihad.

I cannot imagine many things more genuinely offensive than celebrating the death of a man, but this was doubly gross considering young Abaraonye had met with and debated with Charlie in the past. The cold heart of a scruffy liberal.

This was obviously not something I could endorse or condone, but thankfully, he was ousted from the Oxford Union. So, when I was re-invited earlier this year, I took more time to seriously consider the invitation. When I heard my friends and fellow patriots Laurence Fox and Tommy Robinson were also joining the team, my arm was twisted. We would be debating, “This House believes the West is Right to be Suspicious of Islam.” This time we were on the side of the house. We were still expecting a hostile audience, and I was still expecting us to be massively outvoted - although Laurence and Tommy seemed more optimistic of our chances - but it would be fun nonetheless, and an important topic for us to add our voices to. So, I booked my tickets back home to Blighty and arranged a hotel in Oxford, all at my own expense, I might add, only to be told the event was cancelled.

This will not come as a surprise to anyone who has been keeping tabs on British politics. Our Government - both Labour and the Conservatives consecutively - have been pushing for ‘Islamophobia’ laws for some time now, which essentially amounts to Islamic blasphemy laws. Islam is gradually taking over our nation. I believe the population of Mohammedans is currently around 6% and growing rapidly. Liberals will use this number as some kind of defensive argument, claiming, “it’s only 6%, that’s hardly a takeover”, not realising that a critical mass is only 6.5%. Demographics are destiny, and the current projects show that by somewhere between 2050 and 2060, Britain will no longer be a majority-British country. As it stands, England is no longer a majority-Christian country, for the first time in our nation’s history. But by 2050-2060, she will be predominantly Islamic, too. Heavens forbid.

The president of the Oxford Union - a Palestinian Mohammedan and Free Speech advocate - called to let us know that Thames Valley Police were putting roadblocks in the way. Not literally, as is their job, but metaphorically, doing what they can to prevent the event from going ahead. They claimed it would cost £80,000 in fees to organise security for the evening. Laurence stepped in and offered for his organisation to pay these fees, as he is one of Britain’s most outspoken Free Speech campaigners. Clearly unhappy that their obfuscation had been unsuccessful, TVP strongly encouraged the OU to move the debate, which is traditionally held on Thursdays, to the following Monday. The OU were happy to comply. The event was back on again. Those of us coming from the US had to adjust our travel arrangements accordingly.

Then, Thames Valley Police made another attempt to thwart the event. They teamed up with Oxford City Council to put pressure on the poor students, organising what would be their biggest event in a long time. TVP and the Oxford Council said the event would have to be outright cancelled because it would be too inconvenient; they may have to reroute traffic, etc., for security reasons. Is that not their job?

The Oxford Union is the oldest debating society in the world, founded in 1823, when discussing politics and religion were prohibited at the University of Oxford. This house has a longstanding tradition of defending free speech and open debate in Britain, despite the Establishment.

It seems to me that the Establishment is terrified of what might happen. And that only highlights the importance of this particular topic of debate. People are genuinely petrified of wild Mohammedans going on a vengeful rampage, or as the legacy media would put it, “mental health issues” and/or “unclear motive”. Could asking the question “This House believes the West is Right to be Suspicious of Islam” cause us to be martyred by followers of the “religion of peace”? Surely not. Just because the infamous warmonger Mohammed spread his ideology through warfare, intimidation, subjugation, deception, and barbarism does not mean his followers necessarily would.

It could be that the Establishment is more afraid of backlash from the permanently offended Left. It may be that those who are offended on behalf of others are complaining as usual. We know protests were planned for 28th May, which would have been fine as the event had been moved to 1st June. Let them protest against an empty hall, and stop being bent by the will of the mob.

The Police Commissioner informed the president of the Oxford Union that they would have to release a statement that the event had been cancelled. She complied under pressure from her peers and higher-ups, who were worried about souring the Union’s relationship with the police and the council, which is understandable but would definitely undermine the very premise of the Union. However, upon sending a draft statement to the authorities, the president received an edited version that removed any inference that the decision was made by the police and the council. In fact, the new statement said something along the lines of the OU should not have taken on such an event in the first place, and they wanted to thank the Thames Valley Police and local Council for their support. The chutzpah! Thankfully, the current president, being an advocate of Free Speech, pushed back against this blatant bullying. The response from the Commissioner was that they were not ordering the Union to cancel the event, but were strongly advising them to do so. To which the president realised she was being manipulated rather than ordered, and so pushed back in return. Lastly, the police and council told the Union they could hold the event, but only if it was held on or around the last day of Trinity Term. Of course, this would mean no students would be available to attend, as they would have mostly gone home once their classes were wrapped up. The Establishment is playing games, trying to prevent me, Laurence Fox and Tommy Robinson from debating the critical topic of Islam and its place in Britain. It seems they have already decided the answer, that we should not be suspicious of Islam. And if we are, we must do so silently. If this cannot be debated at the Oxford Union, where can it be debated?

At one point, Sir Jacob Rees-Mogg stepped in as a trustee of the Oxford Union. He joined the opposing side of the debate, arguing that we should not be suspicious of Islam, which I see as shameful for a Catholic, but admirable for a proponent of Free Speech. It was his impression that the authorities could not bully the students into submission if he - a high-profile former government minister - was involved. Unfortunately, he was as wrong on this as he has been about a great many things regarding the shape of our country lately.

In Britain, we should be able to debate all ideas. Why is this particular ideology off the table? Not to protect Islam from civil debate, but to protect us from the Mohammedan reaction to civil debate, which is generally not civil at all.

How many times have I covered stories of Christians who have been arrested for criticising Islam? Or worse, just for quoting the Bible and Mohammedans taking offence at them doing so. It is almost as if we have a two-tiered system in this so-called Christian country, where Islam has become a protected class.

Megyn Kelly has kindly offered to host the debate on her show. I am hopeful that this conversation is had publicly, and that in doing so we can encourage others in Britain to push back against the heavy-handed state censorship, Islamic blasphemy laws, and Islam itself.

Sometimes, it feels like Islam has already taken over our political class.

As it happens, we are talking about this precise problem on my Next Crusade this week, with my excellent guests Paul Weston and Brenna Morella discussing how Islam took over Britain, and how it is trying to do the same in America.

The Next Crusade - Episode Four:

• Paul Weston on the apparently successful Islamic takeover of Britain.

• Breanna Morello on the attempted Islamic takeover of Texas.

Not to mention my upcoming book will be on this very topic: The Silent Jihad.

Be sure to return to CalvinRobinson.com every Friday for a roundup of the latest episodes of my Common Sense Crusade and the Next Crusade.

If you’d like to catch them the moment they are released, tune in to my YouTube channel live on Wednesdays for my Common Sense Crusade, and Thursdays over at NXR Studios for The Next Crusade.

Every day, here on Substack, I share the Daily Lives of the Saints.

My Common Sense Crusade is on pause while I am in Britain for the debate that is now not happening, but the Next Crusade and Daily Lives of the Saints continue as normal.

Thank you for reading, watching, and subscribing! God bless you.