Discussion about this post

User's avatar
RussellCW's avatar

Father, yours is an important and timely essay.

Raised in the 1960s & 1970s, I’m just old enough to remember the Old Rite, in Melbourne, where my father wore a suit & my mother a hat, gloves & stockings, to Sunday Mass at St Finbars, East Brighton.

We fasted before Mass: nothing to eat til after. We were lucky to have an Irish firebrand Parish Priest, Fr Ashe. Ireland is incapable of producing a priest like that anymore.

Mass was an awe-filled experience prior to Vatican II. Should a baby cry during the service, it was understood that the mother took her child outside till it ceased. I attended one Good Friday 3:00pm Service, which took nearly 3 hours, yet the Church was so full, that people stood outside in the rain! And there were no lay assistants with Communion.

After each Mass, we gathered outside for a social chat. Most walked to Mass. It was customary for those with a car to give a lift home for little old ladies. They were delightful, & I miss them.

Yes, I’m reminiscing. But there’s nothing wrong with that. Especially as you’ve provided the more serious theological context of which we ought be aware.

We’re still like fish out of water with the watered down Mass. Fortunately, there are a handful of Parishes which offer the Tridentine Mass.

Rev. Matthew Littlefield's avatar

Ok. I have read your article, and I appreciate the perspective you are coming from. I stand in unison with you on this key point:

"To Christians, we are the new Israel - the spiritual Israel - the Church is a continuation of God’s chosen people. The Old Testament points toward the coming of Christ, and the New Testament speaks of His fulfilment of the old prophecies and promises of God. No one is replaced, but everyone is welcomed in. The Jews who followed their Messiah - the Christ - became members of the Church, and the Gentiles who joined them were grafted in. This is a marvellous gift our Lord has given us."

This is historical Christianity. And those who deny it simply do not understand how they are undermining the work of the Lord and his Apostles.

But I don't think you made your case well with Protestantism. You may have shown why it is deficient from your perspective, but not why it is Jewish. I would argue that dispensationalism is exactly what you said, it is the Judaisation of Christianity.

But I think this Judaising can creep into any denomination or church. It was even creeping in with Peter in Galatians 2, which demonstrates this, profoundly.

I see many aspects of this in my wider denomination, evangelicalism in particular, and Protestantism in general. But I also see it in the high church denominations, like Catholicism.

For instance the importation of the priesthood, which has the mix of Roman practice, and Hebrew high priestly practice, the emphasis on the tradition of the elders (church tradition) over scripture, instead of an aid and commentary as it should be, and more.

I think it is easier, at times, to see how Judaising has impacted other Christians, rather than ourselves, again highlighted by St Peter.

I really appreciate a lot of your work, even though we are of different traditions. I think seeking to challenge the Judaising of the church is important. Paul spent much of his ministry doing that. He would be horrified to see modern Christians teaching that there is two people's of God, one in Christ, one in the flesh. This is a repudiation of his teaching on the issue. He would be horrified, but not shocked, as he saw this sort of teaching heaps in his day.

Thanks for your thoughtful article.

45 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?