Discussion about this post

User's avatar
AL Smit's avatar

Read the story of the 'Thief on the Cross' and ask yourself how he was saved. The thief was obviously a convicted criminal yet Jesus told him "TODAY you will be with me in paradise". Surely a convicted criminal would have to spend weeks, months or even years in purgatory! But that's not what the Bibles says. Also Jesus' death and resurrection pays 100% for your salvation. Your works, baptism, mass, church membership, purgatory etc etc it is as "filthy rags". It is ZERO%. Only Jesus' sacrifice can make a full and complete payment for your soul. Nothing else will do.

If the dead in Christ who are to be raised at Jesus' 2nd coming can hear our prayers then they can hear millions of people, praying in different languages, from different time zones all around the planet, they can understand these millions of prayers and they know how to respond, then they are gods!!! They are all-hearing, all-knowing, all-powerful and all-present. By your argument you're treating them as gods. God cannot be bribed because someone 'important' puts in an extra special word for us. Thee Creator God of the universe does not need 'help'. Treating God as if He needs intermediaries is blasphemous and a mockery of His Word.

I'm not saying these things without love. These issues are massively important. For the sake of your soul don't get this wrong just because you feel a particular religion is more comfortable or a better fit for your identity. Pray directly to Jesus and ask Him to show you the way. Relying on Jesus 100% is the only way to live and the only way to die. God Bless.

Jakob's avatar

As an Anglo-Catholic, I find the defense of Purgatory puzzling, as it stands contrary to both Scripture and the witness of the early Church. The 39 Articles explicitly reject the doctrine, rightly stating that it is "vainly invented" and "repugnant to the Word of God." This aligns with the broader Catholic faith, which does not affirm Purgatory as the Roman Church does. The Orthodox, the Coptics, the Ethiopians, and other ancient branches of the Church all reject it, and it is notably absent from the writings of Clement, Ignatius, Justin Martyr, Athanasius, and even Augustine.

While I understand the Roman Catholic perspective of Purgatory as a penitential process of purification, it cannot be considered a truly universal doctrine of the Church when it lacks firm scriptural and patristic foundation and is held solely within the Roman tradition. However, I fully affirm the practice of praying for the dead and to the saints. God, who is not bound by time or the constraints of creation, hears our prayers as part of His eternal nature. These prayers are an expression of love, and God’s response to them transcends our temporal understanding.

It is our rejection of such "Romish" doctrines, including Purgatory as it is defined, that affirms our place as members of the broader Catholic Church in the Anglican tradition. We uphold the faith of the undivided Church, grounded in Scripture and the Creeds, without the later innovations of the Latin West.

I worry that embracing Purgatory signals a drift toward Rome, rather than remaining steadfast in the Anglo-Catholic understanding of the Church as part of the one, holy, catholic, and apostolic faith. As a High Churchman, I see great beauty in our Anglican identity, holding to the ancient traditions while rejecting what is unsupported by the earliest witness of the Church. This balance allows us to remain truly Catholic, without being Roman.

108 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?